Social Media Networks Worldwide

List of last month's most polluting Social Media Networks websites worldwide

Domain mCO2 Reduction Potential Energy Reduction Potential Total mCO2 Emissions Total Energy Consumption
1 twitter.com twitter.com 1399404 t 1 TWh 93294 t 95 GWh View Report
2 tiktok.com tiktok.com 1367842 t 1 TWh 91189 t 73 GWh View Report
3 instagram.com instagram.com 1284562 t 1 TWh 85637 t 89 GWh View Report
4 facebook.com facebook.com 267474 t 275 GWh 66868 t 69 GWh View Report
5 vk.com vk.com 25763 t 30 GWh 25763 t 30 GWh View Report
6 pinterest.com pinterest.com 350265 t 202 GWh 23351 t 13 GWh View Report
7 discord.com discord.com 165980 t 146 GWh 11065 t 10 GWh View Report
8 linkedin.com linkedin.com 58900 t 112 GWh 8414 t 16 GWh View Report
9 tumblr.com tumblr.com 63877 t 22 GWh 4258 t 1 GWh View Report
10 ok.ru ok.ru 0 g 0 Wh 3813 t 4 GWh View Report

Note Regarding CO2 Emissions and Energy Consumption Estimates

It is important to note that the emissions estimates in this page are based on the most recent data available. As a result, the emissions estimates may be outdated if there have been significant changes to your website since the last update.

FAQ

What is meant by "mCO2 Reduction Potential" in the context of website CO2 emissions?

Reduction Potential in the context of website CO2 emissions refers to the digital waste generated by internet usage, such as abandoned digital content, redundant or duplicate data, and unused or outdated files. This digital waste contributes to the overall carbon footprint of websites and other digital platforms by consuming energy and resources during their storage and processing. It is important for website owners and developers to implement efficient data management practices and regularly clean up their digital waste to minimize their environmental impact.